Coordinated Annual Review on Defence (CARD)

Pic for CARD

In the November 2016 Council conclusions on implementing the EUGS in the area of security and defence, Member States invited the HRVP/Head of the EDA to present proposals on the scope, modalities and content of a Coordinated Annual Review on Defence (CARD). Such an annual review will help foster capability development addressing shortfalls, deepen defence cooperation and ensure more optimal use, including coherence, of defence spending plans. Building on the Policy Framework for Systematic and Long-Term Defence Cooperation, the objective of the CARD is “to develop, on a voluntary basis, a more structured way to deliver identified capabilities based on greater transparency, political visibility and commitment from Member States”.

The EDA, in cooperation with the European External Action Service (EEAS), subsequently produced a concept paper detailing the various CARD elements. This paper received advice from the EU Military Committee and was also discussed by Member States’ Defence Policy Directors, Capability Directors, National Armaments Directors as well as in several EU Council working bodies and the EU Military Committee.
On the basis of that work, the Council endorsed on 18 May 2017 the modalities to establish the CARD, starting with a ‘trial run’ involving all Member States as of autumn 2017. Over the following months, EDA, in its role as CARD Secretariat, compiled all available information on participating Member States’ (pMS) defence expenditure and capability development, grouping it along the three lines indicated in the Council Conclusions: (i) Member States’ aggregated defence plans, (ii) the implementation of the EU Capability Develop-ment Priorities resulting from the CDP, and (iii) the development of European cooperation.

The information gathering was followed by bilateral dialogues between participating Member States and EDA and EUMS in order to complete, discuss and clarify the data. This provided the basis for the analytical work that resulted in a CARD Aggregated Analysis from which the final CARD Trial Run Report was derived. It was presented and discussed during EDA's Ministerial Steering Board in on 20 November 2018 (for main outcomes of the trial run, see below).
 

First full CARD cycle (2019-2020)

In 2019-2020, the first full CARD cycle took place with EDA acting as the CARD penholder. The final CARD report was presented to Defence Ministers in November 2020. It identifies a total of 55 collaborative opportunities throughout the whole capability spectrum, considered to be the most promising, most needed or most pressing ones, also in terms of operational value. Based on this catalogue of identified opportunities, Member States are recommended  to concentrate their efforts on the following six specific ‘focus areas’ which are not only covered by the EU Capability Development Priorities agreed in 2018 but where the prospects for cooperation are also looking particularly good (encouraging number of interested Member States, national programmes already underway or in the pipeline), namely:

  • Main Battle Tanks (MBT)
  • Soldier Systems
  • Patrol Class Surface Ships
  • Counter Unmanned Aerial Systems (Counter-UAS)
  • Defence applications in Space
  • Military Mobility

Launching new collaborative projects in the six focus areas can bear a “significant impact on both Member States capability profiles and the coherence of overall European capability landscape”, is stated in the report.

In addition to that, 56 options to cooperate in R&T have been identified as well. The latter span from Artificial Intelligence (AI) and cyber defence, to new sensor technologies, emerging materials and energy efficient propulsion systems as well as unmanned systems and robotics.

Conditions for cooperation “favourable”

The CARD reveals that conditions for multinational cooperation in all six capability focus areas are “favourable”, also from a time planning perspective. Therefore, a broad participation of Member States can be expected in collaborative projects related to those areas, at system and subsystem levels, including through linkage of such new collaborative projects to already existing programmes, the report finds.

It therefore urges Member States to make full use of all identified collaborative opportunities (especially to inform national defence planners, including for the next wave of proposals in the PESCO context as well as the upcoming EDF annual work programmes).

The report also stresses that collaborative development of capabilities in these six focus areas requires industrial cooperation for prime contractors, mid-caps and SMEs with positive effects on the competitiveness of the European Defence Technology and Industrial Base (EDTIB).

For full details of the first CARD report, click here

 


EDA acting as CARD secretariat

For the CARD to provide real added value, it is of great importance to ensure the most up-to-date and detailed information possible is collected from Member States on defence plans (including spending plans), as well as the implementation of the EU capability development priorities resulting from the Capability Development Plan (CDP). That crucial role of gathering all relevant information is being played by the EDA who, thogether with the EUMS, acts as the ‘CARD secretariat’.

 

2017 CARD Trial Run Methodology 

EDA developed a methodology approved by Member States’ Capability Directors in September 2017 which is being applied during the current 2017-2018 CARD trial run. It involves the following elements and procedural steps:

  • Initial Information. EDA’s starting point was an analysis of all CARD relevant information already available in EDA databases or being made available by Member States, including NATO’s Defence Investment Pledge Report for those who are also NATO Allies. The result of this first initial information gathering was shared with Member States bilaterally.
  • Bilateral Dialogues. EDA then entered into bilateral dialogues with each Member State individually, in order to validate, complement and consolidate the initial information gathered in the previous phase, in consistency with NATO’s Defence Planning Process.
  • CARD Analysis. Once the bilateral dialogues were completed, the EDA compiled and analysed Member States’ contributions and produced a ‘CARD Analysis’ that presented aggregate data and identify trends regarding defence spending plans, implementation of priorities resulting from the 2014 CDP and relevant to defence research programmes, as well as opportunities for defence cooperation. This analysis is being discussed with Member States and will form the basis of the final report to be submitted to Ministers in November 2018.
  • CARD Report. The final CARD report presented the main results of the review as well as associated recommendations.

 

CARD Trial Run Outcomes

The CARD Trial Run findings confirmed that there is a positive trend in the overall defence spending of the 27 participating Member States over the 2015-2019 period, although in real terms defence expenditure in 2017 still remained below the 2005 level. Investment in general, and procurement expenditure in particular, is increasing across all Member States, but at a very different pace and scale. The 20% collective investment benchmark was reached in 2016 and defence investment will likely continue to increase further, representing some €47 billion of investment in 2017.

However, 12 Member States represent 81% of the total EU defence investment. On the other hand, investment in defence research and development has decreased from 23,5% of total investment in 2015 to 21% in 2017 and is estimated to decrease further over time. Eight Member States represent 95% of European defence R&T expenditure. The fact that the collective benchmark of 2% of total defence spending being invested in de-fence R&T has never been reached, raises concerns regarding the long-term European technological innovation capacity. 

The EU Military Committee’s contribution to the CARD Trial Run established that the EU does not have avail-able all required military capabilities necessary for the implementation of the EU CSDP military Level of Ambition derived from the EU Global Strategy. These deficiencies are reflected in two sets of High Impact Capability Goals (HICG), addressing major shortfalls in the short-term and medium term. The level of Member States’ deployed forces in CSDP and non-CSDP operations and missions remained constant over the last 3 to 4 years, with an average manpower of 48.000 troops, although there is a disparity between Member States in terms of type of operation, engagement framework and overall operational effort. 

Data shared by 12 Member States shows a steady increase, in relative terms, in the collaborative dimen-sion of capability development - from 24% in 2015 to nearly 31% in 2017. Data shared by 15 Member States shows that the collaborative part of European Defence R&T expenditure remained around 11% between 2015 and 2017 but decreased by 6% in absolute terms. 

Tailored collaborative opportunities presented to individual Member States were well received. The top collaborative areas retaining their interest were Short Range Air Defence (SHORAD), armoured vehicles (including main battle tanks), helicopters (light and medium), medical support, cyber defence, satellite communications, tactical Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), maritime mine countermeasures and maritime security. All these collaborative opportunities are linked to the recently approved 2018 EU Capability Development Priorities.

The CARD Trial Run recommendations on the European defence expenditure landscape propose that pMS include in their multiyear defence plans voluntary national objectives regarding the annual growth rates of their defence budget and R&T expenditure, as well as concrete measures aimed at rebalancing defence expenditure in favour of investment programmes and enhancing their participation in collaborative projects. 

Recommendations focusing on the European capability development landscape propose that pMS aim for greater coherence between their national capability development plans, including on timelines, engage more in cooperative activities, and consider channel-ling investments on medical capabilities into ensuring a European capability in support of CSDP operations.

The CARD Trial Run also highlighted the fact that Member States still carry out defence planning and acquisition mostly from a national perspective. The EU needs to move from ad hoc multinational projects towards a systematic and structured alignment of Member States’ defence planning. Member States do cooperate, but an accurate and comprehensive EU overview on what, to what extent and with whom, is still lacking. 

 
CDP, CARD, PESCO, EDF: different tools for a common goal 
CARD is the cornerstone of recent EU security and defence initiatives and an essential intermediate step in the overall EU capability development process. Several EU security and defence initiatives where launched quasi simultaneously – the CDP revision, CARD and PESCO.
The coherence between these initiatives must be ensured and the way they affect each other is not only to be understood but purposefully planned. A coherent approach from priority setting to output is important and adequate sequencing is critical to ensure that the different steps of the overall approach reinforce each other.

In a somewhat simplistic manner, we could say that the CDP tells us what to focus our common efforts on, the CARD gives us an overview of where we stand and identifies next steps, PESCO in turn gives us options on how to do it in a collaborative manner, while the EDF could provide the funds to support the implementation of cooperative defence projects in general, but with a bonus, if in PESCO.
 
Coherence defence initiatives_rgb
 
 

  

Participating Member States

  • Belgium
  • Bulgaria
  • Czech
  • Germany
  • Estonia
  • Ireland
  • Greece
  • Spain
  • France
  • Croatia
  • Italy
  • Cyprus
  • Latvia
  • Lithuania
  • Luxembourg
  • Hungary
  • Malta
  • Netherlands
  • Austria
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Romania
  • Slovenia
  • Slovakia
  • Finland
  • Sweden